Review row hits Sri Lanka-Pakistan Test
AFP, Colombo :
Pakistan were granted an extra review option Friday after being robbed of a wicket due to an apparent error by TV umpire Paul Reiffel during the second Test in Colombo.
The incident took place during the opening day’s play at the P. Sara Oval on Thursday when Pakistan asked for a review after on-field umpire Sundaram Ravi turned down an appeal for a catch at slip against Kaushal Silva off Zulfiqar Babar.
After repeated replays-the Decision Review System (DRS) for the series does not feature snicko or hot-spot-Reiffel, the former Australian fast bowler, ruled in favour of the umpire indicating there was no edge off the bat.
But the replays also suggested that if the ball had not hit the bat, the batsman was leg-before since the ball would have gone to hit the stumps, a possibility Reiffel did not take into account.
International Cricket Council (ICC) rules on DRS state that “… in reviewing a dismissal, if the third umpire believes that the batsman may instead be out by any other mode of dismissal, he shall advise the on-field umpire accordingly”.
Pakistan were granted an extra review option Friday after being robbed of a wicket due to an apparent error by TV umpire Paul Reiffel during the second Test in Colombo.
The incident took place during the opening day’s play at the P. Sara Oval on Thursday when Pakistan asked for a review after on-field umpire Sundaram Ravi turned down an appeal for a catch at slip against Kaushal Silva off Zulfiqar Babar.
After repeated replays-the Decision Review System (DRS) for the series does not feature snicko or hot-spot-Reiffel, the former Australian fast bowler, ruled in favour of the umpire indicating there was no edge off the bat.
But the replays also suggested that if the ball had not hit the bat, the batsman was leg-before since the ball would have gone to hit the stumps, a possibility Reiffel did not take into account.
International Cricket Council (ICC) rules on DRS state that “… in reviewing a dismissal, if the third umpire believes that the batsman may instead be out by any other mode of dismissal, he shall advise the on-field umpire accordingly”.
