Skip to content

Privatisation must be cautiously approached to avoid exacerbating

The ballooning debt amassed by government agencies from state-owned banks in Bangladesh is sounding alarm bells, demanding swift and resolute action. Recent revelations from the Bangladesh Bank expose a troubling reality: government organisations have accumulated loans totaling Tk. 70,485 crore over the past few years, with a staggering default of Tk. 183.62 crore plaguing these entities.
The underlying causes behind this concerning trend are manifold and complex. Mismanagement, corruption, inefficiency, and underproduction stand out as prominent factors contributing to the financial woes afflicting these state-owned enterprises. The stark revelation that 10 out of 49 government agencies reported losses totaling Tk. 20,789 crore in the last fiscal year underscores the pressing need for immediate intervention.
Among the delinquent borrowers, the Bangladesh Jute Mills Corporation (BJMC) looms largest, burdened with an outstanding debt of Tk. 131.30 crore owed to various state-owned banks. This glaring example underscores a systemic flaw that cannot be ignored. The current trajectory is unsustainable, posing significant risks to the stability of the banking sector and the broader economy.
It’s important to take the necessary actions. The government must conduct a comprehensive review of these agencies, pinpointing inefficiencies, eradicating corruption, and implementing vital reforms. Additionally, there must be a strategic reevaluation of which sectors are best suited for continued government oversight and which could benefit from private sector involvement. The proposition put forth by certain experts to explore the privatisation of select agencies warrants serious consideration. Privatisation has the potential to inject much-needed efficiency, accountability, and innovation into these entities, potentially transforming them into profitable ventures that contribute positively to economic growth.
However, any move towards privatisation must be cautiously approached to avoid exacerbating existing inequalities or compromising essential services. Any transition prioritises the protection of workers’ rights and the public interest. The government can afford to ignore this burgeoning crisis. Failure to address these issues promptly will only deepen the financial woes of state-owned banks, erode investor confidence, and hinder the country’s economic progress. It is incumbent upon policymakers to demonstrate resolve and responsibility in safeguarding the nation’s financial health and securing its future prosperity.