High Court Division : (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Mahmudul Hoque J Ismail Mia. (Md)………….. . Plaintiff- Petitioner Vs Abeda Khatun and others……Defendant- Opposite-PartiesJudgment July 10th, 2018Code of Civil Procedure (V of 1908) Order VII, rule 11 (d)Section 115 (1)The relief by way of declaration to the effect that the sale deed is void, illegal and not binding upon the plaintiff along with declaration of title are the principal reliefs in the suit and recovery of possession which is incidental and consequential relief....
Appellate Division :(Criminal) Nazmun Ara Sultana JSyed Mahmud Hossain JMd Imman Ali J MA Sukkur……………..AppellantvsMd Zahirul Haque and another…………Respondents JudgmentMay 6th, 2014 Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Section 420 Normal financial transaction between debtor and creditor does not come within the scope of any offence. .. …. (15) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)Sections 415 and 420 The allegations of bouncing of cheque simplicitor does not ipso factor constitute any offence as defined under Section 415 punishable under Section 420 of...
(From previous issue)16. He further argued that Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, shall attract where any cheque drawn by a person on an account “maintained by him” with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account is returned by the bank unpaid. But in the present case the account from which the cheques were issued is maintained by Seus Fabrics Limited, not by the accused petitioner; the accused petitioner...
High Court Division :(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction)Farah Mahbub JMahmudul Hoque JShahidul Islam (Md)…..Accused-Petitioner in all the casesvsState and another………Opposite-Parties in all the casesJudgmentFebruary 5th, 2018Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1893)Section 561A In an appropriate case, if on the face of the document which are beyond suspicion of doubt, placed by accused and not disputed by the prosecution the accusation against him cannot stand, for, it would be travesty of justice, if the accused is relegated to trial and he is...
High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Md. Habibul Gani JMd. Akram Hossain Chowdhury JBirisiri Division of Garo Baptist Convention Bangladesh represented by its Secretary, Pastor Bimol Sangma……………….. PetitionerVSRegistrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others———–RespondentsJudgment May 18th 2015Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972 Article 102 (2)Garo Baptist Convention of Bangladesh is a private organization registered with the office of the Registrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms and mere registration does not state that the organization is running business with the affairs of...
High Court Division(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Khizir Ahmed Choudhury JLablu Ansar (Md). ……..Petitioner vs Md Salim Uddin and others ………………… Opposite-PartiesJudgment October 26th, 2017 Evidence Act (I of 1872) Section 90 Evidentiary value of old documents- The documents in question are as far back of 1966 which being old documents has evidentiary value and specially those documents has not been assailed by initiating any legal proceeding before the Court of law. …… (13) Code of Civil Procedure (V of 1908) Section...
(From previous issue)16. In the instant case although the petitioner claims to have filed a complaint to the administrative authority and thereafter to CPTU against the decision of the procuring authority to evaluate its technical proposal under Rule 56 of the Public Procurement Rules, 2008 in our opinion it is in fact an Appeal to the concerned authority against the rejection of Va Tech Wabag Limited’s bid. This view appears to be further evident from the fact that the Tender...
High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Tariq ul Hakim J Md Faruque (M Faruque) J Va Tech Wabag Ltd………….…………Petitioner in WP No. 13490 of 2017vsDhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA), represented by its Managing Director. WASA Bhaban, Dhaka and others RespondentsJudgment February 27th, 2018 Public Procurement Act (XXIV of 2006)Section 29(1)A person suffering or is likely to suffer loss or damage due to failure of a procuring entity to fulfill its obligations under this Act, to complain against that...
?????????????? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ??????????????, ???? ?(???????.?????.???.??) ?????? ??-??.??.????.???.??.???.??-??? ?????? ?? ?????, ????, ? ??, ???? ?????????? ???????????? ?????-????? ?????? ?????-????? ????????? ?????? ? ????? ? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??.??.???.???.??.???.??-??? ????? ? ?? ????????, ?????????????????? ???? ? ??????? ???????? ????????????? ?????? ??”?? ??, ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?-?-???? ??? ?-?-???? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ?????-????? ?????? ?????-????? ????????? ??????? ??? ????? ? ??????? ????????? ????¯’? ??????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ????????? ? ? ? ????????? ??? “?” ???...
High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Tariq ul Hakim J Md Faruque (M Faruque) J Va Tech Wabag Ltd………….…………Petitioner in WP No. 13490 of 2017vsDhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA), represented by its Managing Director. WASA Bhaban, Dhaka and others RespondentsJudgment February 27th, 2018 Public Procurement Act (XXIV of 2006)Section 29(1)A person suffering or is likely to suffer loss or damage due to failure of a procuring entity to fulfill its obligations under this Act, to complain against that...
?????????????? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ??????????????, ???? ?(???????.?????.???.??) ?????? ??-??.??.????.???.??.???.??-??? ?????? ?? ?????, ????, ? ??, ???? ?????????? ???????????? ?????-????? ?????? ?????-????? ????????? ?????? ? ????? ? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??.??.???.???.??.???.??-??? ????? ? ?? ????????, ?????????????????? ???? ? ??????? ???????? ????????????? ?????? ??”?? ??, ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?-?-???? ??? ?-?-???? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ?????-????? ?????? ?????-????? ????????? ??????? ??? ????? ? ??????? ????????? ????¯’? ??????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ????????? ? ? ? ????????? ??? “?” ???...
High Court Division :(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Sheikh Abdul Awal J Bhishmadev Chakrabortty J Firozul Islam … Petitioner VsState and another……. ……… Opposite-Parties Judgment August 8th, 2018 Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1898) Sections 439(4) and 561A Miscellaneous case under Section 561A of the Code is hit by Sub-Section (4) of Section 439 of the Code …….(12) Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1898) Section 100 From a reading of the provisions of law, it is clear that the...